
Samsung Exynos 2400 Vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Specification and Benchmark Comparison – In the ever-evolving world of smartphone technology, the battle of chipsets has taken center stage, shaping the experience of users worldwide. At the forefront of this technological tug-of-war are two giants: Samsung’s Exynos 2400 and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
These two powerhouses represent the pinnacle of mobile processing technology, each boasting unique features and capabilities that leave tech enthusiasts and everyday users alike eagerly comparing them. In this comprehensive exploration, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Vs Exynos 2400, we delve deep into the heart of these chipsets, dissecting every aspect to bring you a clear, detailed comparison.
As we journey through this comparison, our focus will not just be on the technical specifications, but also on how these chipsets enhance the user experience in real-world scenarios. Whether it’s the blazing-fast processing speeds, the jaw-dropping graphics, or the AI capabilities that transform how we interact with our devices, this article promises to shed light on every facet. F
or those who are tech-savvy and for those who simply seek the best smartphone experience, this comparison between Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Vs Exynos 2400 is tailored to guide your understanding and satisfy your curiosity.
You can also check its ranking in the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List. You Can Also Check Our Processor Comparison Tool, where you can compare any Processor to anyone.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, using a 4nm process, showcases an 8-core design with a high-performing CPU (1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 Prime core, 5×3.2 GHz Performance -core and 2×2.3 GHz Efficiency-Core). This setup underlines Qualcomm’s commitment to delivering top-tier performance.
In contrast, the Samsung Exynos 2400, also built on a 4nm process but enhanced with Samsung’s LPP+ technology, features a more diverse 10-core configuration (1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4, 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720, 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720, 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520). Its prime core peaks at 3.21 GHz, balancing high performance with efficient multitasking.
Both chipsets embrace the ARMv9 architecture, with the Exynos incorporating the slightly more advanced ARMv9.2-A. This aspect highlights subtle advancements in processing capabilities.
Supporting UFS 4.0 for storage, both chipsets are equipped to handle rapid data transfer, crucial for modern smartphone use. This detail underscores their readiness for future technological demands.
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Exynos 2400 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 10-core CPU | 8-core, Kryo CPU |
| CPU Cores | 1x 3.2GHz (Cortex-X4) 2x 2.9GHz (Cortex-A720) 3x 2.6GHz (Cortex-A720) 4x 2.0GHz (Cortex-A520) | 1x 3.3GHz (Cortex-X4) 3x 3.2GHz (Cortex-A720) 2x 3.0GHz (Cortex-A720) 2x 2.3GHz (Cortex-A520) |
| Process Technology | Samsung’s 4nm LPP+ | TSMC’s 4nm process |
The GPU capabilities of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Samsung Exynos 2400 are distinct in their offerings. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 750 GPU, part of the Adreno 700 series and running at 770 MHz, is designed for robust performance and efficiency. It’s well-suited for gaming, evidenced by its support for Snapdragon Elite Gaming™ and various video codecs, along with features like 4K upscaling.
Contrastingly, the Exynos 2400 boasts the Xclipse 940 GPU based on the advanced AMD RDNA 3 architecture. With a higher operating frequency of 1009 MHz, this GPU emphasizes smoother graphics rendering and includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing for more immersive gaming experiences. Additionally, its support for high-definition video playback at 8K 60FPS and 4K 240FPS underlines its multimedia prowess.
While both GPUs are formidable, real-world performance tests and benchmarks will be crucial in determining their effectiveness in practical scenarios. This detailed analysis highlights the unique strengths each chipset brings to the table in terms of GPU performance.
In the NPU comparison, Samsung’s Exynos 2400 marks a significant advancement with its new AI engine, reportedly 14.7 times faster than the previous generation. It features a complex NPU structure capable of extensive MAC operations, indicating powerful AI processing abilities for tasks like image generation and real-time translation.
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 counters with its Hexagon NPU, known for its efficiency and speed in running large AI models and image generation. Qualcomm’s NPU also boasts a high TOPS capability, underlining its strength in AI mobile computing. This comparison illustrates the evolving landscape of AI capabilities in mobile chipsets.
In the memory aspect, both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Samsung Exynos 2400 utilize LPDDR5X RAM, indicating a focus on high-speed and efficient memory performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 supports a higher RAM frequency at 4800 MHz compared to the Exynos 2400’s 4200 MHz.
Both chipsets can support up to 24 GB of RAM, ensuring ample memory for demanding applications. This similarity in RAM capacity and type, along with the difference in frequency, highlights how each chipset manages memory utilization and bandwidth, impacting overall device performance.
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Exynos 2400 both excel in connectivity features. The Snapdragon boasts the X75 5G Modem-RF system, supporting extensive cellular technologies and achieving high 5G speeds. It also features Qualcomm’s FastConnect™ 7800 System for advanced Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.4.
The Exynos 2400 matches in 5G capabilities, also offering tri-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.3. Both support various GPS technologies and USB-C connectivity, ensuring a wide range of wireless and wired connectivity options for users. This detailed analysis underscores the advanced connectivity solutions these chipsets provide.
In the camera capabilities, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 uses the Qualcomm Spectra™ ISP, allowing up to 200 MP photo capture and 8K HDR video capture. The Exynos 2400, with its own ISP, pushes the envelope to 320MP in single camera mode and similarly supports 8K video capture.
Both chipsets offer advanced multi-camera configurations, high-resolution video capture, and support various video codecs, underlining their focus on delivering superior camera and video performance in smartphones.
Alright, let’s talk about the real showdown between the Samsung Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. You know, the kind that goes down in the Antutu benchmark ring. The Exynos 2400 steps up with a killer score of 1666145, proving it’s not just a processor; it’s a force of nature. Handling CPU, GPU, memory, and UX like a boss, it’s setting a whole new standard for flagship processors.
And here comes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Antutu score 1958738.
Switching gears to the Geekbench arena – it’s like the ultimate efficiency duel. The Exynos 2400 lays down a Single-Core Score of 2203 and a Multi-Core Score of 7021. It’s not just about raw power; it’s about how efficiently it handles both single and multi-threaded tasks.
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Geekbench score for Single-Core Score is 2213 and a Multi-Core Score is 7325

As we wrap up this mobile processor showdown, the verdict is in: the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 takes the crown as the superior powerhouse. With a more potent CPU and GPU, it flexes its muscles, showcasing an undeniable edge in processing might. The benchmark scores on both Antutu and Geekbench tell the story of its supremacy, leaving an indelible mark on the competition.
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 stands tall, demonstrating not just raw power but a comprehensive superiority that resonates across all performance metrics. From Antutu’s battlefield to Geekbench’s efficiency duel, it emerges victorious, solidifying its position as the go-to choice for those who demand the pinnacle of mobile processing excellence.
As the tech tale unfolds, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is the hero that takes center stage, leaving no doubt that it is the better processor in this compelling saga of mobile technology.
no, Snapdragon processor are better.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 3 is better processor than exynos 2400, in terms of CPU, GPU, and benchmark.
in the compariosn between Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Vs Exynos 2400 the Snapdragon 8 gen 3 scored better in both antutu and Geekbench.
| Manufacturer | Samsung Qualcomm |
| Announced | 17 January, 2024 24 October, 2023 |
| Model | S5E9945 SM8650-AB |
| Class | Flagship Flagship |
| Size | Samsung’s 4nm LPP+ 4nm |
| Cores | 10 8 |
| CPU Configuration |
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520 1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 Prime core, 5x3.2 GHz Performance -core and 2x2.3 GHz Efficiency-Core |
| High Frequency | 3210 MHz 3300 MHz |
| Performance Core | 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 |
| Power Efficient Core | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0 |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU based on AMD RDNA 3 architecture, 6-core Qualcomm® Adreno™ 750 |
| GPU frequency | 1009 MHz 770 MHz |
| GPU Architecture | Samsung Xclipse Adreno 700 |
| FLOPS | 4730.8 |
| OpenCL Version | 2.0 2.0 |
| DirectX Support | 12 12 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 1.3 |
| Shading units | 1536 |
| Video Encoding |
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 Codecs: H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)), HDR10, Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), Dolby Vision®, HDR10+, H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP8, VP9, AV1 |
| Video Playback |
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS Codecs: H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)), HDR10, Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), Dolby Vision®, HDR10+, H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP8, VP9, AV1 |
| Gaming | Snapdragon Elite Gaming™ |
| APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | AI Engine with 17K MAC NPU(2-GNPU+2-SNPU) and DSP Qualcomm® AI Engine (Qualcomm® Hexagon™ NPU) |
| TOPS Speed | 44 TOPS |
| Extra Feature |
Qualcomm® Hexagon™ NPU • Fused AI accelerator architecture • Hexagon scalar, vector, and tensor accelerators • Hexagon Direct Link • Upgraded Micro Tile Inferencing • Upgraded power delivery system • Support for mix precision (INT8+INT16) • Support for all precisions (INT4, INT8, INT16, FP16) |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X LPDDR5X |
| RAM frequency | 4200 MHz 4800 MHz |
| RAM Max | 24 GB 24 GB |
| Max Bandwidth | 64 Gbit/s |
| Bus Speed | 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit |
| Cellular Modem | Snapdragon™ X75 5G Modem-RF system |
| Cellular Technology |
5G NR Sub-6GHz 9.64 Gbps (DL) / 2.55 Gbps (UL) 5G NR mmWave 12.1 Gbps (DL) / 3.67 Gbps (UL) LTE Cat.24 8CA 3Gbps (DL) / Cat.22 4CA 422Mbps (UL) Cellular Technology: sub-6 GHz, HSPA, TDD, LTE, WCDMA, FDD, SA (standalone), NSA (non-standalone), TD-SCDMA, CDMA 1x, EV-DO, GSM/EDGE, EN-DC, CBRS, NR-DC (mmWave-sub6 dual connectivity), SA (standalone) mmWave, mmWave |
| 5G Modem | |
| 5G Network |
5G NR Sub-6GHz 5G NR mmWave 4x4 MIMO (Sub-6), 2x2 MIMO (mmWave), 8 carriers (mmWave) |
| 5G mmWave | |
| 5G sub-6 GHz | |
| Download Speed | Up to 9640 Mbps 10 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | Up to 2550 Mbps 3.5 Gbps |
| Dual SIM | |
| Extra Feature |
Multi SIM: Global 5G Multi-SIM, Dual SIM support Qualcomm® DSDA Gen 2 (Dual Data) |
| wireless System | Samsung Wireless System Qualcomm® FastConnect™ 7800 System |
| Wi-Fi Band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct 802.11be, 802.11ax, 802.11ac, 802.11n, 802.11g, 802.11b, 802.11a (6 Ghz, 5 GHz, 2.4 GHz) |
| WiFi-5 | |
| WiFi-6 | |
| WiFi-6E | |
| Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Download Speed | 5.8 Gbps |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE Bluetooth® 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO Qualcomm® Location Suite (Galileo, Beidou, NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, QZSS) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG Interface Type: USB-C Specification Version: USB 3.1 Gen2 |
| NFC | |
| Extra Feature |
Features: TDLS, Passpoint, High Band Simultaneous (HBS) Multi-Link, Wi-Fi Optimized Connectivity, MU-MIMO (UL/DL), Wi-Fi Aware R3, Wi-Fi QoS Management, Miracast, Wi-Fi Location, OFDMA (UL/DL), Voice-Enterprise, XPAN Technology |
| ISP | Samsung ISP Qualcomm Spectra™ Image Signal Processor •( Cognitive ISP, Triple 18-bit ISPs ) |
| Single Camera | Up to 320MP in single camera mode Up to 200 megapixel photo capture (Up to 108 MP single camera @ 30 FPS with Zero Shutter Lag) |
| Multi Camera |
Dual-camera 64MP+32MP @30fps
. Up to 64+36 MP dual camera @ 30 FPS with Zero Shutter Lag . Up to 36 MP triple camera @ 30 FPS with Zero Shutter Lag |
| Video capture |
8K @ 30FPS / HDR, HDR10+, and HLG
8K HDR video capture @ 30 FPS 4K video capture @ 120 FPS Slow-mo video capture at 720p @ 960 FPS |
| Video Codec | Up to 8K decoding: 60fps with 10-bit HEVC(H.265), VP9, AV1 Up to 8K encoding: 30fps with 10-bit HEVC(H.265), VP9 Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), Dolby Vision®, HDR10, HDR10+, Google Ultra HDR |
| Extra Feature |
Bokeh Engine 2 for video capture Pro Sight video capture |
| Display Support | 4K/WQUXGA @120Hz QHD+ @144Hz 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz |
| Refresh Rate | 144Hz 144Hz |
| Extra Feature |
Maximum External Display Resolution: 8K @ 30 Hz High Dynamic Range (HDR): HDR Vivid, HDR10, HDR10+ Color Depth: 10-bit Color Gamut: Rec. 2020 |
| Audio Playback |
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Qualcomm Aqstic™ audio codec, Qualcomm Aqstic™ smart speaker amplifier Audio Processing Technologies: Snapdragon Sound™ technology |
| Security Features |
Samsung Knox
Qualcomm® 3D Sonic Sensor, Qualcomm® 3D Sonic Sensor Max Secure Processing Unit (SPU): Biometric Authentication (Face), Biometric Authentication (Fingerprint), Biometric Authentication (Iris), Biometric Authentication (Voice) |
| Fingerprint Sensor | |
| Face Detection |
| Charging Speed | fast Charging Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 5 technology |
| AnTuTu benchmark scores | 1666145 1958738 |
| Geekbench scores |
Single-Core Score - 2203 Multi-Core Score - 7021 Single-Core Score - 2213 Multi-Core Score - 7294 |
| 3DMark | 16273 |
|