
Specification Comparison Table | Key-Differences
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Vs Helio G95 Specification Comparison – These are two processors from Qualcomm and Mediatek known for their exceptional performance and efficiency. Both of these processors have been designed with advanced features and capabilities to provide users with top-notch performance and speed.
However, their architecture, manufacturing process, and other features differ, which can impact their performance and user experience.
In this article, we’ll compare the Mediatek Helio G95 Vs Snapdragon 680 processors, focusing on their features, performance, benchmark scores, and other important aspects.
Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, gamer, or business professional, knowing these differences can help you choose the best smartphone or device for your needs.
You can also check its ranking on the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List. Additionally, you can use our Processor Comparison Tool to compare any processor to another.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 features an octa-core CPU with 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) cores. The processor is built on a 6-nanometer process and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In comparison, Helio G95, a mid-range chipset, comes with 2x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The chipset is built on a 12-nanometer process and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
The graphics processing unit (GPU) is another crucial aspect of a chipset. Snapdragon 680 comes with an Adreno 610 GPU with a frequency of 950 MHz, while Helio G95 has a Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU with a frequency of 900 MHz. In terms of memory, both chipsets support the LPDDR4X memory type with a frequency of 2133 MHz. In terms of storage, both the chipsets support eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.1 storage types.
However, Helio G95 supports a higher maximum memory size of 10 GB compared to the Snapdragon 680’s 8 GB. The maximum bandwidth of both the chipsets is almost similar, with Snapdragon 680 supporting 17 Gbit/s, and Helio G95 supporting 17.1 Gbit/s.
Both Snapdragon 680 and Helio G95 come with their respective multimedia image signal processors (ISP). Snapdragon 680 has Hexagon 686 NPU, while Helio G95 features Da Vinci NPU.
The maximum display resolution supported by both the chipsets is 2520 x 1080 pixels, while the maximum camera resolution supported by both chipsets is 1x 64MP and 2x 16MP for Snapdragon 680, and 1x 64MP and 2x 24MP for Helio G95.
When it comes to video capabilities, Helio G95 offers better features. It can capture 4K videos at 30FPS, while Snapdragon 680 can only capture 1K videos at 60FPS. However, both chipsets can playback 1080p videos at 60FPS and 4K videos at 30FPS. In terms of video codecs, both chipsets support H.264, H.265, and VP9.
Connectivity is another crucial aspect to consider while choosing a chipset. Snapdragon 680 comes with an X11 modem that supports LTE Cat. 13 4G with a download speed of up to 390 Mbps and an upload speed of up to 150 Mbps. Helio G95, on the other hand, supports LTE Cat. 12 with a download speed of up to 600 Mbps and an upload speed of up to 150 Mbps. Both the chipsets support Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.1 and 5.0, respectively. When it comes to
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 benchmark scores are impressive in various tests. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Antutu Score is 269430 and Helio G95 Antutu Score is 344606.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Geekbench Score, (a benchmark that measures CPU performance) for the Single-Core is 373 and the Multi-Core score is 1548, and Helio G95 Geekbench Score for the Single-Core is 513 and the Multi-Core score is 1604.
| Snapdragon 680 | Helio G95 |
|---|---|
| Newly Launched | Better Geekbench Score |
| Has a smaller size (6 versus 12 nm) | Better ANtutu Score |
| higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2050 MHz) | Supports higher memory bandwidth (17.01 Gbit/s against 17 GB/s) |
The Snapdragon 680 boasts a better specification sheet, superior performance, higher benchmark scores, and the latest technology compared to the Helio G95 processor.
These features make the Snapdragon 680 the best choice for users looking for top-of-the-line performance and advanced device capabilities.
“Make sure to check out our full comparison table for Mediatek Helio G95 Vs Sd 680 and feel free to share your feedback or suggestions with us.
Our goal at The Miraq is to provide our readers with the most informative and reliable tech resources possible.”
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm Mediatek |
| Announced | 27 October, 2021 01 September, 2020 |
| Model | SM6225 Mediatek Helio G95 |
| Class | Low end Low End |
| Size | 6nm 12nm |
| Cores | 8 8 |
| CPU Configuration |
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 2 x Cortex-A76 @ 2.05GHz, 6 x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| High Frequency | 2400 MHz 2000 MHz |
| Performance Core | 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 2 x Cortex-A76 @ 2.05GHz |
| Power Efficient Core | 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 6 x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 W |
| Storage Type | eMMC, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| GPU | Adreno 610 ARM Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz 900 MHz |
| GPU Architecture | Adreno 600 Bifrost |
| FLOPS | 243 Gigaflops 195.8 |
| OpenCL Version | 2.0 2.0 |
| DirectX Support | 12 12 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 1.1 |
| Shading units | 128 64 |
| Video Encoding |
H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC))
H.264, H.265 / HEVC |
| Video Playback |
Up to 1080p @ 60 fps H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265 / HEVC, VP-9 |
| APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | Qualcomm® Hexagon™ 686 Da Vinci |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X LPDDR4X |
| RAM frequency | 2133 MHz 2133 MHz |
| RAM Max | 8 GB 10 GB |
| Max Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s |
| Bus Speed | 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit |
| Cellular Modem | Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ X11 LTE modem Mediatek 4G Modem |
| Cellular Technology |
TD-SCDMA, LTE TDD support for CBRS, LTE TDD, CDMA 1x, EV-DO, GSM/EDGE, LTE FDD, WCDMA (DC-HSDPA), WCDMA (DC-HSUPA) 4G Carrier Aggregation (CA), CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A (SRLTE), 4G FDD / TDD, HSPA + |
| 5G Modem | |
| 5G mmWave | |
| 5G sub-6 GHz | |
| Download Speed | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Upload Speed | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Dual SIM |
| wireless System | Qualcomm® FastConnect™ 6100 Mediatek Wireless System |
| Wi-Fi Band | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11ac Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac) |
| WiFi-5 | |
| WiFi-6 | |
| WiFi-6E | |
| Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth® 5.1 Bluetooth® 5 |
| GPS | GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS |
| USB | USB-C USB-C |
| NFC |
| ISP | Qualcomm® Spectra™ 346 Mediatek ISP |
| Single Camera | Up to 64 MP 64MP |
| Multi Camera |
13+13+5 MP triple camera 16+16 MP dual camera 24MP + 16MP Dual Camera |
| Video capture | 1080p @ 60 FPS 4K at 30FPS |
| Video Codec | H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Display Support | • FHD+ (1080 x 2520 @ 90 Hz) • HD+ (900 x 1600 @ 90 Hz) 2520 x 1080 |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz 60Hz |
| Audio Playback | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Bluetooth Audio | Qualcomm Aqstic™ audio codec up to Qualcomm® WCD9385 |
| Security Features | Secure Boot, HW Crypto Cores, Qualcomm® Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), Trusted UI Framework, Widevine™ L1 V15 DRM, Debug Security, Qualcomm® Content Protection Framework, HW/SW storage security, HW/SW Key Management Fingerprint and Face Unlock |
| Fingerprint Sensor | |
| Face Detection |
| Charging Speed | Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 3.0 technology |
| AnTuTu benchmark scores | 269430 344606 |
| Geekbench scores |
Single-Core Score - 373 Multi-Core Score - 1548 Single-Core Score - 513 Multi-Core Score - 1604 |
| 3DMark | 441 1480 |
|